The value of global vs local sustainability reporting: why both matter for UK businesses

In the evolving landscape of sustainability reporting, businesses in the UK face a key question: Should we align with global standards like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), or focus on local frameworks like the UK Social Value Model (PPN 06/20)?

This is not just a technical choice; it’s a strategic decision that speaks to the values we hold, the impact we want to make, and the communities we serve. The good news is that we don’t have to choose one over the other. Instead, we can start a dialogue on how to bring the best of both worlds together.

Global Recognition, Local Relevance

When we report through a globally recognised framework like GRI, we communicate in a language that resonates with stakeholders worldwide. Investors, clients, and partners outside of the UK understand the metrics, and this can open doors to international opportunities. But while GRI offers global credibility, it might feel a bit distant from the UK’s specific needs—like the emphasis on local job creation, supporting disadvantaged communities, or tackling inequality.

This is where the UK Social Value Model comes in. It’s designed to help businesses like ours speak directly to UK public sector buyers. It’s practical, focused, and meets regulatory requirements. However, limiting ourselves to only this local model means we may miss out on telling a broader, more comprehensive sustainability story.

The Power of a Dual Approach

Rather than viewing these frameworks as competitors, we can use them to complement each other. What if we embraced the global scope of GRI while also aligning with local priorities under PPN 06/20? By doing so, we’d not only meet the needs of UK contracting authorities but also demonstrate our impact to international stakeholders.

For smaller organisations, I understand that the prospect of reporting across two frameworks might seem daunting. But it doesn’t have to be. With the right planning and tools, we can simplify the process by identifying common data points and using them for both frameworks. And for those of us just getting started, focusing on material issues that matter to our stakeholders can reduce the complexity of reporting, allowing us to ease into these standards gradually.

Inviting Collaboration

This conversation isn’t just about reporting; it’s about building stronger, more sustainable businesses that contribute to the well-being of our communities and our planet. Whether you're a small business navigating public procurement or a large organisation managing global supply chains, your insights, challenges, and experiences are invaluable.

I’d love to hear your thoughts on how you’ve approached sustainability reporting. Have you found a way to balance global standards with local needs? Are there pain points or solutions you’ve discovered that others might benefit from? Let’s share our experiences and learn from one another.

By coming together, we can craft a sustainability reporting approach that not only helps us win public contracts but also positions us as responsible, forward-thinking businesses on the global stage.

If you’re interested in discussing this further or exploring potential collaborations, I’d be delighted to connect. Let’s work together to build a future where global and local sustainability efforts reinforce each other.

Author: Omar Hadjel MCIM - Certified Sustainability Consultant